Category Archives: Howard Popeck

Lifetime Customers – by Howard Popeck

Your profit increases because customers enjoy the way you now treat them – and want to return. Instead of buying just one car (for illustrative example) from you, and then disappearing, they return whenever they need a new one. Over the course of their lifetime how many cars could you realistically expect them to buy from you? Think about this.

Potentially, that customer can demonstrate loyalty from the time they pass their driving test to the time they take early retirement – if they want to. Yes, I agree that’s it’s less clear cut outside of that industry – but I argue strongly that the basic principals hold true. So please don’t self-deflect yourself by thinking that because I’ve chosen the car retail industry for the illustrative example through this series that the underlying truth is irrelevant to you. It isn’t!

  • Is it conceivable that he/she could buy perhaps eight vehicles in that time? Excluding inflation and other considerations, let’s assume that the average value of each of those eight vehicles over that lifetime is £12,500. It doesn’t take a genius to realise that this customer is actually worth £100,000 to you. Apply that logic to all aspects of your customer ‘interface’. You’d be foolish not to recognise the merits of customer long-term loyalty. The logic runs as this:
  • Be good to your customers
  • They like dealing with you
  • They buy from you
  • They like you – they spend more money
  • They spend more money – you’ll want to treat them better – wouldn’t you want to do everything you could for  a £100,000 customer?
  •  You treat them better – they’ll keep coming back

If you’re a cynic, you might say ‘I’ve come across all of this before but if this was the practical advice, where is the guidance I need in order to achieve this, assuming that I really want to ?’

Well first of all let’s look at the primary objective. You have to differentiate yourself from the competition.

If you can’t differentiate yourself, then you have to wonder why any customer would want to choose your showroom rather than one of your competitors. If you don’t know the real answer (forget marketing hype, ignore self-delusion) you’ve got a real problem.

Many retailers faced with this challenge go for the obvious and unsophisticated answer. They strive to be cheaper than everybody else. This is somewhat illogical. Taken to extremes, if the public really wanted the cheapest possible car, then the whole of Britain would be driving Kia Cars or whatever. They aren’t. People buy value, not price !

 

Competition? What competition – by Howard Popeck

Preliminary note

The previous part of this series was a bit lengthy. Frankly I couldn’t see a sensible way of splitting it. However the ‘pay-off’ comes here in the next piece. It would be in your interests though to search out, to read and to think about the previous story “It’s sad, but it’s true”. Anyway, moving on . . .

Competition – what competition?

The point I was trying to make in the previous part of this series is that the equipment that he ended up purchasing could have been purchased from at least 10 or 15 other retailers in the UK. In some cases, at a substantial discount.

I have no doubt that he was aware of this – but was intrigued by the eccentric nature of how I worked and the fact that I was prepared to go just that little bit further offering a good service. And my previous small courtesies to Mr X obviously resulted in a first class referral.
Even today I note that many of my then competitors still insist on the customer fitting in with shop schedules rather than customer requirements. The whole idea of collecting a customer from Heathrow airport would be alien to them. The best that would probably be offered would be the name of two or three mini cab operators. Breakfast was way out of the question.

People just don’t like sellers. Sad, but true – by Howard Popeck

People Don’t Like Retailers. Not really. Not when it comes right down to it. They tolerate – at best.

Let’s take the UK retail car industry again for the illustrative example industry in this series. You okay with that?

Let’s not kid ourselves, people generally speaking don’t like doing business with car dealers. Their perception of that industry isn’t particularly high. Many take the view that the purchase of the car is not on the whole an enjoyable experience. Now at this point for illustrative purposes I’ll discuss how I built up my own business selling ludicrously overpriced hi-fi.

I speak from experience, having faced many of the same dilemmas that ambitious car retailers face today. At first sight there may not appear to be too many parallels between hi-fi and cars – but look behind the facade.

More money than sense?

The systems I was selling started at round about £30,000 and increased progressively. Like a car, they were a major purchase. Like some of you, my business was plagued with poor reliability; manufacturers who didn’t keep an appropriate parts inventory; customers who preferred an argument rather than a solution – and so on and so forth. All this in addition to fixed costs that were out of step with the overall margin – and competitors who sold only on price.

Speculative but potentially lucrative

Back in 1976 when I decided there was a market niche for selling up-market hi-fi, I was anxious not to move from my established successful business into this speculative but potentially lucrative new venture. My hi-fi business was run in the evening from the front room of my home.
There was no passing trade and I had to rely on innovative and low cost advertising.

In those days of course the average value of the system was far lower than the £30,000 I’ve previously mentioned. There was no backlog of happy customers to gain referrals and no supplier endorsement. They felt that my method of operation was at best eccentric and at worst, foolhardy.

Business was tough

Payments to my suppliers were on a proforma basis for some considerable while. Business was tough. After my first year having generated a small but worthwhile profit I had a feel for the supply side of the industry – but I wasn’t too clear about the customer side.
I took the unusual step of asking customers what they did and didn’t like about doing business with me. They told me – sometimes in quite painful language. I discovered two key rules which older and wiser businessmen had probably known for years – but came as a revelation to me.

  1. If you ask customers in a non-aggressive way what they truly feel and you give them an environment in which they can reveal their feelings, the majority of them will choose to do. The information they give you is golden, however painful it may be.
  2. When receiving that information, be entirely and utterly ego-less. They are criticising your Company rather than you personally. It’s not helpful to be defensive in the face of criticism be it valid or otherwise.

That crucial first suggestion

The first suggestion was that our opening hours were somewhat inconvenient in that we opened at 6 pm to 10 pm – because I was still running my original business. My perception was that this was convenient for business people who after hours would like to choose their hi-fi away from shop hours.

It was true, but it wasn’t the whole truth

What I hadn’t realised of course was that there was a far larger market who were quite happy to do their ‘shopping’ in conventional daytime hours.

So, I had to reconcile how I could run my two businesses together. The decision was made to sell business No. 1 and go into the hi-fi business full time. I opened conventional working hours of 9 am-6 pm which of course was entirely convenient for the new category of customer – but somewhat less convenient for our original customers who had got quite used to choosing their hi-fi at night.

Had I been less ambitious, I would probably have thought as so many British retailers do and struck an attitude of ‘I’m here for my convenience, not yours’ – but I didn’t. I opened from 10 am to 10 pm. That was the solution, or so I thought . . .

Mr X

Twelve hours a day, five days a week made me disinclined to open Saturdays however, it just so happened that I received a referral from Mr X for his close friend, a business man who was flying in from Canada en route to Sweden. His employers were going to buy him an audio system as a reward for a spectacular achievement in his home country. His flight arrived at Heathrow at 6.30 am. on a Saturday.

It was suggested by Mr X that it would be an act of extraordinary courtesy and efficiency to collect his friend from Heathrow instead of the traditional black cab, give him breakfast, take him back to my showroom (still my living room) and do a demonstration. Note: there was no mention of a potential purchase. All this because his connecting flight to Sweden was at 1.00 pm the same day.

Being commercially immature and not seeing the wood for the trees, I was reluctant to do this. Mr X, being older and wiser patiently explained to me that I was privileged to be offered this opportunity. In short, I’d be VERY I’d be wise to accept it – and an idiot to ignore it.

Embarrassed? Oh yes

I have to say with some embarrassment that I quizzed Mr X as to whether his friend was likely to make a purchase there and then. I was displaying many of the attitudes of the unprofessional salesman. Again, wise council suggested that offering good service, albeit exceptional service, would pay dividends.

Sceptical, I collected the Canadian from the airport – and he insisted on buying me breakfast! He spent just under one hour in my living room, having previously told me that his bank had given him the go-ahead to spend $50,000 (equivalent of about £35,000 at that time) on an audio system. He was quite prepared to accept any reasonable recommendation I made that fitted within that budget. The sale was made – but more importantly, I learnt an invaluable lesson.

Reducing buyer/seller conflict in the UK retail car market – by Howard Popeck

In case you wondered . . .

Those of you who’ve been following this series will now realise that for convenience and accessibility, I’m using the UK car retailing industry as the chosen illustrative commercial arena – where convenient. What you’ll not have realised I guess is that in part I’ve done so because I spent many years in a sleeves roll-up / hands-on advisory capacity there. Not all of my advice fell on deaf ears!

Perspectives

Let’s examine some of the areas of buyer/seller conflict. Observe these from a different perspective please. Can you see them as areas of opportunity where you can start to differentiate yourself from your competitors? You can’t? Okay. Bear with me and you will. That’s a promise!

As a car purchaser, I have to say that one of the most aggravating aspects of getting my car serviced is the lack of availability of a loan car, let alone a decent loan car. Certainly various dealers have advertised this facility but in practice when I’ve come to use it, the loan car (note the singular) was ‘out’. I either had to take a bus or cab back or whatever.

Surely . . .

  1. it must be possible to compute the ratio of loan cars needed to the number of service bookings per week ?
  2. the ambitious franchise would want to do this ?

Obviously not everyone who brings their car in is going to ask or expect a loan car. On the other hand, just imagine how customer perception of your business would increase for those that wanted (and got) this service ? They wouldn’t believe it at first sight – but just imagine the powerful and positive view when a clean, good quality loan car were available waiting for them when they booked their car in the morning ?

If you were one of your customers, how would you feel?

Wouldn’t you pay a bit extra, or at least be less motivated to look for a cheaper price if say your camera supplier, washing machine supplier or say hi-fi supplier offered this?

The importance of loan items

If this means you have to make a substantial investment in loan equipment then it also means that you’re making a substantial investment in your customer satisfaction.

I can assure you this will reward you to a greater extent and more quickly than any discount advertising ever could.

If this means that you have to have an ever increasing loan stock – then so be it. That’s wonderful – because it means that the number of people who are using your business is increasing.

It could be argued that the size of your loan car fleet is an effective yardstick to determine total customer satisfaction in your service department. Ever thought of that?

How Successful Do You Want To Be? – by Howard Popeck

You can apply financial criteria at various aspects within the business but I take the view that the most meaningful yardstick is the measure of total satisfaction as perceived by your customers.

This may seem an intangible measure – however this is far from the case. There are factors which are tangible. For example:

  • The quantity of repeat business
  • the ratio of complaints received to the number of jobs completed – and
  • the number of referrals from happy customers.

Adopt these yardsticks enthusiastically and you are on a sure-fire path to becoming ‘the best’.

Taking a determined decision to become ‘the best’ could end up making your life simpler, more enjoyable and certainly more profitable.   The cynic might argue that there’s no way that this could make life simpler. Wrong ! Once taken, it cuts through a lot of needless debate.  All decisions will be predicated by applying the template “Is this proposed action going to make us better than our competitors?  If yes, and we can afford to do it, then we’ll do it.  If it won’t, then we won’t”
Enjoyable because conflict is reduced because the work force are working to common objectives. Call it ‘common accord’ if you prefer.  In subsequent articles I’ll discuss what to do with people who don’t fit the company accord.  In the interim, my recommendation is that such people no longer stay with your business, irrespective of their performance.

Disharmony is one of your Achilles heels. Harmony can be your principal asset.

Adding Value / 10 Golden Rules of Customer Service – by Howard Popeck

It’s often said that the failure of British businesses to anticipate (and then respond to) true customer needs is the primary reason for their lack of success. Traditionally, the emphasis has leaned towards supplying the customer with what the supplier thinks the customer needs – rather than vice versa. This in inappropriate for current market conditions.

Observation and experience has identified golden rules (or commandments if you like) which would define how the ambitious supplier would want to interface with their customers.

  1. Be ego-less: Ask customers what they want and then give it to them, time and again and again. Don’t tell ‘em what they need.
  2. Get your priorities right: At the end of the day the customer welcomes good manners but – above this they welcome – efficiency. Merely being polite doesn’t guarantee that you’ll get the job done the first or any other time. Get a monitoring system to ensure this.
  3. Be realistic, be conservative. Customers have a right to expect you to keep your word and therefore if you’re sensible, you won’t make promises that you can’t keep. But you’ll strive to exceed what you have promised.
  4. Whatever the customer asks for, the answer is yes. Don’t worry about the stupid requests because quite simply they just aren’t worth the hassle.
  5. You’re going to get complaints so don’t make it more difficult for the customer. Don’t compound their annoyance by unnecessary management strata. Create an environment where every employee has the authority to deal directly with complaints.
  6. Be worried if there aren’t any complaints. This may well mean that your customers are too scared or too indifferent to tell you how you’re going wrong. Encourage them to tell you the truth. Never believe that no news is good news.
  7. Measure performance – and keep measuring. If sports teams can measure their performance, why can’t sales teams, service teams, administration teams, reception staff etc ?
  8. Pay your staff the maximum you can afford, not the minimum that you can get away with. ‘Pay peanuts and you get monkeys’ was never truer today than it was previously.
  9. Good manners is not old fashioned. Give customers the respect they deserve. Be polite to them and see your business increase. At worst, stop your sales trickling away!
  10. Borrow, copy, call it whatever you like but at the end of the day seek out those in your industry who are doing the best possible job – and learn from them. Having learnt from them then try and improve it.

And finally . . .

Make a profit. Unless you make a profit you’re unlikely to stay in business and therefore the preceding ten become meaningless.

Some of the secrets of achieving worthwhile results from a group brainstorming meeting – by Howard Popeck (2/3)

Keeping the fear simple, effective and credible

The ‘fear’ I applied was uncomplicated. My promise was unless I got enthusiastic co-operation during this meeting, then the topic would reappear on every subsequent meeting agenda until I, and the person paying my not inconsiderable consultancy fees, was satisfied.

That approach always worked – sooner or later.

So anyway, yes I was both tough and fair. That was my promise. The scepticism, occasionally verging on overt cynicism was confronted by the evidence to support my promise. Quite simply, the service reception staff were obliged to ‘experience’ the same problem – but through the eyes and ears of the sales team. Simple as that.

It’s odd. It’s unusual. It works!

For illustration, let’s stick with the aforementioned problem in the Franchised retailer car showroom. That problem being the poor conversion from walk-ins to test-drives.

As an aside – for those of you unfamiliar with the way in which the sales process works in car retailers, the objective is to get the potential buyers behind the steering wheel and on the road i.e. the test drive. That’s because statistically, 1 in every 2 (or so) test drives results in an order, sooner or later. Thus the primary driver in this exercise (no pun intended) is the quantity of walk-ins converted to a test-drive.

A discussion of how to boost the number of walk-ins, is not part of this discussion. The focus, I repeat, was/is the problem of how to increase the conversion ratio from walk-ins to test drive.

I need to point out that I’m not going to discuss what the solution was. That’s not the point of this at all. What I’m teaching you here is the process that led to the decision.

Stage #1

Everyone is invited to contribute three simple ideas. There is no debate regarding the comparative merits at this stage. My control is such that everyone knows that this first stage is to get the ideas up on the board and nothing else, just yet.

Now of course with say six (for example) contributors, that means I want 18 ideas. You’ll perhaps appreciate, but then again possibly not, that the first person asked has, on the face of it, the easiest task. The last person of the six has, initially at least, the hardest task because he/she has to come up with three ideas that don’t duplicate the first 15. Not easy. So here’s what you do.

You go around the group and each person contributes the first of their 3 ideas. Then you repeat the exercise for the second and third ones. Part 1 – job done.

Part 3 will appear here next week

The Inside Track on Intelligent Commercial Decision Making – by Howard Popeck (4/9)

Categorisation

When I’m chairing meetings, or even sitting in and observing them, I always keep in mind the short-term considerations when making a decision as to the long-term consequences.

I’m always prepared to change my view – when the facts change.

But quite naturally as you hear in Question Time on BBC Radio/4 regarding parliamentary debates, it’s entirely common (but I think utterly inappropriate) to hector or ridicule of the opposite party merely because they have changed their mind. It seems absurd to me that the idea of a U-turn can be considered a sign of weakness or indecision.

Surely if the facts change, it makes complete sense to re-evaluate the situation? Thus my golden rule is ‘be prepared to change – when appropriate.’

Routine or what?

Is the decision that you are contemplating regarding a situation merely routine or possibly unprecedented? Such as an unforeseen emergency.

Could it be that the decision requires strategic thinking with names and objectives translated into plans and timings? Could it be that it requires sub-decisions and so on? Perhaps the issue under discussion is operational, such as employment issues, disciplinary requirements and so on.

On the face of it you might ask what benefit is there in categorising what type of decision has to be made about what sort of situation?

Implications

If you stop to reflect on the above then you’ll realise that it has considerable implications on:

  • Who you decide to bring in to the decision-making process. And . . .
  • The speed of decision making – because of course not every situation requires an immediate response, whereas emergency ones do. And . . .
  • The extent of the risk and consequences of failure.

I’ll be expanding on this as we go through the series as the importance of categorisation becomes progressively more apparent. Hopefully you’ll get in to the mindset that when confronting a decision, even if it’s a sub-component of a major decision, you’ll look closely at who you might need to consult or work in collaboration with to get you your small but important facet of the overall picture professionally placed, and carefully, objectively and rationally thought out.

Finally to return to the aspect of deciding who you’ll invite, or indeed instruct to participate later in this series there will be a series of defined chapters giving you a step-by-step approach how to avoid having meetings with little prospect of an intelligent outcome.

Part #5 will follow next week